Saturday, March 5, 2011

essay 2

Throughout sub-Saharan Africa, dedication to traditions of scholarship and literary production has ensured that knowledge of the past has survived for hundreds of years. Historian John Thornton argued for Africa’s reputation as self-sufficient, fervent bands of tribes that were keen as free countries or states, who were able to maintain an autonomous financial system, armed services and ethos. These African tribes had no real need to make contact with any European countries. Any relations between the Europeans was an act of charity exhibited by the African leaders and landlords (proprietors). And in the event of war, “judicial enslavement was one way of obtaining slaves, and judges… Jesuit observers believed that this was a common in Ndongo as early as 1600”(Thornton, 99). HThis leads to a very concise question: were Thornton’s views factual of the entire continent of Africa and Africans? In comparison to Thornton’s research, a historical investigation by Garafola and McKnight, was conducted as case studies in their book, Afro-Latino Voices. Their book analyzed sources of investigation of human enslavement of African and Latin American peoples. Garafola and McKnight reviewed and made accesible the letters of an infameous African queen- Nzinga (Dona Ana de Souza), Queen of Ndongo, in their book, Afro-Latino Voices.
According to Garafola and McKnight, the Portugese would establish several settlements, forts and trading post along the coastal strip of Africa. For example, on the island of Mozanbique, the Portugese had created a permenant settlement; as a result, they built the Chapel of Nossa Senhora de Baluarte by the date of 1522. The chapel was built upon the labour of slaves. “Africans responded to the increased demand over the centuries by providing slaves…slavery was wide spread in Africa, and its growth and development were largely independent of the Atlantic trade” (Thornton, 74). Thus Thorton argues that slavery had internal interactions ingrained in the hierarchies of African tribal societies. Directly, trade caused extended slavery and was changed in the large quantity of people becoming enslaved. In agreement, “if it did not take place, might just as been the result of economic growth in Africa, perhaps stimulated by commericial opportunity from overseas, perhaps growing in domestic economy” (Thornton, 91). Considering the associations between Portugese and Africans, as obtained in the case of Queen Nzinga Dona Ana de Souza, a rather self-sustaining African state of tribes is mobilizing away from the Portugese traders and settlers. “African legal systems did ensure security of tenure for petty cultivators”(Thornton, 84). Similar to the sharecroppers of North America, trade between African and Portugese permitted farmers to progress into a form of private labor ownership but not land. This concept of slavery as a humanized investment was equalivalent to landownership in Europe. As noted in Queen Nzinga letters, the kingdom of Ndongo was under constant attack from both the Portugese as well as neighboring agressors. Queen Nzinga realized that, to remain a viable African royal, Ndongo had to reposition itself as an intermediary rather than as a supply zone in the Atlantic slave trade (Thornton, 96-98). In order to achieve this success, she rallied Portugal with Ndogno, in chorus, by acquiring a partner in its fight against its mutual enemies and ended Portugese slave raiding in the Ndongo Kingdom. At Queen Nzigna’s baptism, with the Portugese governor serving as godfather, selaed the the relationship between the two countries. But according to Queen Nzinga’s letters, by 1626, the Portugese would force the Queen out of her government and flee to the state named Matamba, well beyond the reach of any Portugese. Queen Nzinga offersed sabctuary to run-away slaves. To boost the morale of her armed services she adopted a form of military discipline called Kilombo, in which youths renounce family ties and were raised communally in militias. Queen Nzinga, served as governor to Luanda, and created political relationships with allies in the Netherlands. These friendships proved useful as their combined forces were not imsufficient in creating a commericial state that could deal with the Portugese colony on equal footing. According to Garafola nad McKnight, the 1633 trade negoitations, Queen Nzinga offered slaves as a peace offering of future trade between Portugal and Luanda-Matamba. In her letter she states,” accept them as my offering to mollify Your Lordship” (McKnight and Garafola, 51-52). From this point on, Queen Nzinga focused on developing Matamba as a trading power by capitalizing on its position as the gateway to the Central African interior.

1 comment:

  1. The question you address as to whether or not Thornton's view of Africa and Africans is factual is a good one. You explain Thornton argued that Africans in Africa were self-sufficient and able to remain autonomous, without any real need for contact with Europeans. This, in comparison to Queen Nzinga, is similar in that she too was able to remain in a state of power, although she eventually had to create political and military alliances to ensure her position. The only criticism I have of your post is that you do not clearly state whether you find Thornton's argument for the legacy of African culture validated in McKnight and Garofalo's work. You bring up good points for both Thornton's argument and McKnight and Garofalo's but do not explain how they might agree or conflict with one another. (Also, run “spellchecker” before you post your paper, lots of typos.)

    ReplyDelete